Isnt CORE 2 supposed to be the latest preferred way to do web pages ? I read articles how CORE 2 is supposed to solve DLL hell. So, I think - lets do CORE 2
But when I use https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/overview it talks of CORE but uses MVC branch ....CORE feels loosly defined. If I select ASP.NET CORE Web Application things break down ( dont align ) with the choices to add view (Razor pages ). The nomenclature is different. And The shared razor pages created say _ViewImport.cshtml, and _ViewStart.cshtml not_ layout.cshtml ( https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/mvc/overview/getting-started/introduction/adding-a-view ).
I have done MVC but CORE 2 looks similar. Is there a tutorial that flows for for ASP.NET CORE Web Application as opposed to (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/mvc/overview/getting-started/introduction/getting-started ) or instead of ASP.NET Web application (NET FRAMEWORK ).
What are the majpr reasons to chose one over the other ? Is CORE 2 just for cross platform ? Is it is simple as just changing file names ??? I do notice CORE throws all the references under dependencies and I dont seem to need as many references. In fact its seems difficult to add references as it doesnt point at framework... so is there something I can read or be told to sort this out ??
Thanks Andrewcw